...if i did it...

My head is spinning. This paper has been the most difficult project in these last few years. Is he liable under contract? Is he liable under tort? Can he be liable under both, and does that mean he should pay more? What accounts for the difference in the courts finding in this case, compared to the two others? What is your reasoning?

My reasoning is he's guilty, period. He's smarmy, and he's guilty as sin.

That is not sufficient.

Fine.

In the middle of all this, this random completely unrelated came to me: Why isn't Shadow of the Wind a bestseller? Think about it. Why isn't it a bestseller?